01.18.12
SOPA/PIPA pie
Permalink
Comments off
News, education, female superiority, and just about anything else
When Mitt Romney was leaving the office of the Governor of Massachusetts, he trashed all official correspondence. But he can’t hide his history. Here are ads created by Ted Kennedy’s campaign when Mitt Romney ran against him.
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
Gingrich says “health care mandates at the state or local level would lead to socialized medicine”. What is a health care mandate? Is that where we would be required to get treatment by our city or town? And even if that were being discussed, which it is not, it would lead to Medicare for all? How?
If Newt doesn’t like the fact that the CBO won’t accept as fact GOP funny numbers and fake facts, perhaps he should work on his truthfulne
Newt has completely lost touch with reality.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
Average Americans will not complain when they “have to go to the Salvation Army to get a TV or to shop for cloths(?)”
Lots of Americans have given up television rather than paying extortiona
More on Occupy Wall Street
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
Rick Perry has been immersing himself in right wing propaganda so long he is unaware that Pelosi is actually a ruthless politician
More on Rick Perry 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
[I found this published in DailyKos.]
My reply to the NY Post’s OWS editorial,.
Murdoch organ the New York Post wrote an editorial yesterday calling for Mayor Bloomberg to mobilize the NYPD to forcibly remove the OWS protesters at Liberty Plaza Park.
I wrote them back to tell them what horrible people they are. I know it probably won’t change their minds, or make it into print, but it sure helped me to relieve some anger. The letter in full is below the fold
Dear Sir or Madam,
I read your editorial, “Time to throw the bums out”. It is obvious from this editorial that you have contempt and disdain for the protestors, the constitution, and the people of this country. But that’s not why I am writing – as a Murdoch-owned publication, that’s standard practice. I writing to you about this piece for a different reason:
It is full of lies.
You wrote, “No one has greater respect for the First Amendment than this paper.” This is a blatant and sickening lie. People with respect for the first amendment do not complain when others exercise the rights enumerated under it. Instead, you desire people’s constitutionally-protected right to assemble and speak to be curtailed because you find the protestors in Liberty Plaza Park a “nuisance.” Let’s be clear: the freedom to exercise constitutional rights is more important than any of the complaints you bring up about OWS.
You wrote, “What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals.” When the OWS protests began you did not portray them as “a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like” but rather as “crazies and criminals”. That has been your agenda from the start. But OWS is no more full of “crazies and criminals” now than it was before – they exist, but are in a clear minority.
Both the above-quoted sentences are part of the tapestry of a larger lie, which is that you have covered this matter evenhandedly and responsibly. From the beginning your paper has been set on portraying the OWS movement as a radical fringe movement, marginalizing them as much as possible to prevent having to deal with their critique of our political economy. The fact is that, as a press organ that makes up a small part of a worldwide media conglomerate, your institutional biases are obviously in favor of the corporatocracy and its ugly hijacking of capitalism. As such, it is no surprise you rail against normal people with the temerity to call out corporate greed.
The way that you have perverted the legacy of Dorothy Schiff is so horrendous that if anyone of your employees had any integrity they would have quite long ago. I do not think it would be possible for me to hold you, collectively, in higher disdain.
Sincerely,
[Joey C]
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
McCain? Strong ethical standards? Seriously. For himself, for his whole life, the bar has just been so low. Rolling Stone did a biography that was just amazing a couple of years back.
http://www
Pathetic.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
Actually, yes. I have done work for poor people. Poor people hire each other to do their work when the economy is booming and there’s more work than time. Think: lawn mowing, painting, dog-walkin
More on Colorado
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
“Surprisin
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off
![]()
No, it is not clear at all that the money collected from secret donors for an organizati
If they lose their status (some have actually never received approval, I can think of one that was recently disallowed because they never bothered to apply), it could be a disaster. Either all the donations would have to count as earned income on which the organizati
More on Campaign Finance
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Permalink
Comments off