10.18.06
More from Roger
One Response to “A comment and commentary”
October 5th, 2006 at 9:35 pm e
So there is a one spelling error and one punctuation error, big deal.
Well, actually, I made four corrections. I will note errors here but not correct them.
Anyone can do a spell check.
Apparently not so, is communication only for lesser mortals than yourself?
Perhaps it be (sic) a good idea to check your own work, since it has a number of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors.
Please elucidate.
Before you shoot off your mouth make sure your own skirts are clean!
Oh, I see. No, I’m not wearing a skirt, are you?
For your information, I completed tech school and graduated of (sic) a major university with an engineering degree. Enough said about that!
Is that why you have so much trouble with details? As my father always used to say, “‘God damn that decimal point!’ said the engineer as the bridge came tumbling down…”
The assertion I made had nothing to do with female teachers and there (sic) teaching quality to (sic) females. It related to females (sic) poor performance in teaching boys.
Of course, I’m waiting for you to give me some evidence on this claim. Half of high school teachers are male in the schools I’ve worked in.
Case in point, female teachers expect boys to act like girls. They do not tolerate restlessness in boys, even though this is there (sic) normal behavior.
What exactly do you mean by “restlessness”? Do you mean getting up and wandering around the room during class? Talking to each others during class? Talking back to teachers? Horseplay during class?
I was under the impression you were looking to have boys educated, not rewarded for being disruptive. There is no school system in the world where boys get credit for being disruptive instead of learning. In fact, there is more toleration of restlessness than there was when you were a child.
Ask yourself a question, why are so many boys put on drugs to change there (sic) behavior today?
Perhaps you should come into a school and observe the behavior of “normal boys” and of students of both sexes who have ADHD.
Is it because the modern women today can’t produce a normal boy or is it because some other element has come to play.
Well, if you want to argue genetics, it’s at least 50% the fault of the male if a boy is not normal. It takes both a male and a female to produce a baby, not multiple females. Perhaps males should take better care of themselves pre-conception, as their reproductive systems are as sensitive to environmental assault as the females’. And perhaps those who are really interested in the outcome should participate in the childrearing and educating process.
Why is it that in years past, this was not considered a necessary treatment for boy behavior problems?
“This..” What was not considered a necessary treatment for boy behavior? Psychoactive drugs? Are you asking why they did not use psychoactive drugs to treat hyperactivity before such drugs existed? In previous generations they used corporal punishment, and encouraged boys to drop out and find menial work at the fringes of society.
This female superiority is bullshit. If female are so dam (sic) smart why don’t they ever win a Novel prize.
They do, and coming from a guy who can’t spell “damn” correctly…
Oh, and yes, I watch fox news (sic) and I am smarter for it.
I’m waiting for evidence of this. Last time I looked, there wasn’t really anything a person could do to affect their IQ.
Can you say the same about you now Dan Rather hero.
Huh? Now here I went to all the trouble of answering your comment point for point, and what do you do? You show me that it was a coincidence that you were capable of putting together words into sentences in the first place. Was this supposed to be a question at all? It doesn’t seem to take the form of a question, and there’s no question mark at the end. It doesn’t seem to take the form of a sentence either. Are you sure you’re smarter for watching Fox News? After that last phrase, I’m not sure that you still speak English. If so, please tell me what Dan Rather has to do with you.
But there’s not much point in trying to reason with someone who is, well, beyond reason. Roger is clearly a product of an education system that stresses the importance of feeling good about your opinions over whether there is any substance to them. It’s hard to argue with someone who makes it up as they go along, as they are clearly strewing disinformation for the purpose of propaganda. It can be done, of course, as was shown in Outfoxed, where the boy got the best of Bill O’Reilly. But it’s a bore.
When I changed the template on this blog, it reset itself to “require moderation for comments from users who have not previously had comments posted”. So Roger kind of got carried away, and started posting more comments. To save you readers from having to track them down, I have copied them here for easier access.
- Name: Roger | | Date: October 6, 2006 You may be right about the blog and the web site, but you do have to give me credit for one thing. I do know how to push your buttons. I know… women don’t get mad they get even so my ass is grass now I guess. Remember, keep the language simple, you are dealing with a inferior male bran here.
- Name: Roger | | Date: October 6, 2006 Sorry, about typo above (s/b brain). Forgot to do a spell check again. I guess when I am dealing with such a superior female I just lose all control.
- Name: Roger | | Date: October 6, 2006 Correction above (s/b Nobel Prize) v and b are to (sic) dam (sic) close together.
- Name: Roger | | Date: October 7, 2006 My, My (sic) aren’t we in love with ourself (sic).
- Name: Roger | | Date: October 8, 2006 May I suggest a improvement for your blog. I suggest that you add a preview for your blog entrée comments section it would eliminate a lot of errors, typo and otherwise. Thanks
Ok, so we’re finally starting to see an awareness that not only is it possible to do work of an improved quality, but that somebody will be observing what you write, maybe even posterity. But really, is there any excuse for using the ‘word’ “ourself”? Isn’t that like ‘himselves’ or ‘myselves’?
