<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A comment from the gallery: female supremacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/</link>
	<description>News, education, female superiority, and just about anything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/comment-page-1/#comment-4159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/#comment-4159</guid>
		<description>Reported on Daily Travel News -- http://www.lifeistravel.com/content/81
5 April, 2007

China is continuing to surprise world society with high rates of economic grows, innovations and recently one more wonder has been offered to public opinion. The city, completely devoted to women will be constructed in one of the Chinese areas. Men, who will be allowed to enter the territory of this city, should obey orders of the wives or girlfriends and to carry out their any whims. The one, who will break this rule, will be punished without the right to the appeal - he will compel to wash dishes at local restaurants.
“The City of Women” will be considered not as the administrative region, but as a sight for tourists. Though the slogans of city also will “Women are always right”, it will not have anything common with feminism.
The idea of the city completely operated by women has been borrowed from the well-known Chinese reference - “Monkeys’ King”. The project has already been approved by the local government, and it will be carried out in current two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported on Daily Travel News &#8212; <a href="http://www.lifeistravel.com/content/81" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifeistravel.com/content/81</a><br />
5 April, 2007</p>
<p>China is continuing to surprise world society with high rates of economic grows, innovations and recently one more wonder has been offered to public opinion. The city, completely devoted to women will be constructed in one of the Chinese areas. Men, who will be allowed to enter the territory of this city, should obey orders of the wives or girlfriends and to carry out their any whims. The one, who will break this rule, will be punished without the right to the appeal &#8211; he will compel to wash dishes at local restaurants.<br />
“The City of Women” will be considered not as the administrative region, but as a sight for tourists. Though the slogans of city also will “Women are always right”, it will not have anything common with feminism.<br />
The idea of the city completely operated by women has been borrowed from the well-known Chinese reference &#8211; “Monkeys’ King”. The project has already been approved by the local government, and it will be carried out in current two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>A nice summation of the issues, Eosuchus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice summation of the issues, Eosuchus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eosuchus</title>
		<link>http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Eosuchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>Will the future be a FemDom Fantasy come true?
No.
Will the future be pretty much Female Controlled, at least in American and Western Europe?
Yes. 

What this means is that women are not going to wear tight leather skirts, five inch heels and carry whips-- unless they actually want to, which is unlikely. 

However, women will fill more and more top jobs. Men will increasingly find themselves working for and reporting to women. Many men will hate this.

Women will have to give up on the old female dream of &quot;marrying up&quot;-- getting a man with great career prospects to support them and their children. 

Women will either stay single and raise their children alone, or they will have to choose
men who are less successful than themselves as partners. Some women will hate this. 

Slowly, over a period of 30 to 50 years, however, the idea of Househusbands, or men who take care of the kids and the house, while their better paid wives keep their careers
will become &quot;normal.&quot;  And as that happens so submissive men will achieve part of their fantasy. 

However, raising kids, getting meals on the table, cleaning the house and ironing Her
blouses for work, may not be quite the same thing as the usual FemDom Fantasy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the future be a FemDom Fantasy come true?<br />
No.<br />
Will the future be pretty much Female Controlled, at least in American and Western Europe?<br />
Yes. </p>
<p>What this means is that women are not going to wear tight leather skirts, five inch heels and carry whips&#8211; unless they actually want to, which is unlikely. </p>
<p>However, women will fill more and more top jobs. Men will increasingly find themselves working for and reporting to women. Many men will hate this.</p>
<p>Women will have to give up on the old female dream of &#8220;marrying up&#8221;&#8211; getting a man with great career prospects to support them and their children. </p>
<p>Women will either stay single and raise their children alone, or they will have to choose<br />
men who are less successful than themselves as partners. Some women will hate this. </p>
<p>Slowly, over a period of 30 to 50 years, however, the idea of Househusbands, or men who take care of the kids and the house, while their better paid wives keep their careers<br />
will become &#8220;normal.&#8221;  And as that happens so submissive men will achieve part of their fantasy. </p>
<p>However, raising kids, getting meals on the table, cleaning the house and ironing Her<br />
blouses for work, may not be quite the same thing as the usual FemDom Fantasy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publus</title>
		<link>http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Publus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principalquattrano.com/blog/2006/12/18/a-comment-from-the-gallery-female-supremacy/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>The comment &quot;I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s spelled with a &#039;w&#039;&quot; was posted in response to your comment [posted shortly after the US Congressional election] that &quot;If it walks like a lame duck, if it looks like a lame duck, if it quacks like a lame duck, it’s a lame duck. ¶ Can you spell &#039;quack?&#039;&quot;

The &quot;W&quot; is a reference to the middle initial of the United States&#039; current lame duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment &#8220;I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s spelled with a &#8216;w&#8217;&#8221; was posted in response to your comment [posted shortly after the US Congressional election] that &#8220;If it walks like a lame duck, if it looks like a lame duck, if it quacks like a lame duck, it’s a lame duck. ¶ Can you spell &#8216;quack?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;W&#8221; is a reference to the middle initial of the United States&#8217; current lame duck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

