From the Office of the Principal

Response to Salon article on Republican Sex Ed initiatives

angela — Sun, 06 May 2012 14:22:54 +0000

This may be the first in a series of responses to Salon articles that need just such a response from me, usually because they are missing an important point. But in any case, the unmoderated comment section (“Letters”) is so messed up there and full of trolls that no meaningful discussion can take place. Besides, I don’t feel like giving them my Facebook and Twitter which they want in order to sell my personal information to advertisers.

I’m not going to quote the article, which I think you should read, because it’s packed with facts about yes, Republican legislative initiatives on sex ed courses. Some of them are just hilariously stupid.

But the article misses the point, the very basis of what Republicans believe about sexuality, and how being exposed to sex ed of any sort will corrupt their precious little angels.

What they believe is that human sexuality is inherently unnatural, that if a child was protected, shielded from it at all times, that child would never experience sexual attraction or have thoughts of sexual desire upon passing through puberty.

They don’t believe that humans start producing hormones on going through puberty, and this creates desire, that the production of hormones in animals (of which humans are one type) results in perpetuation of the species, which is why we are here, because of the powerful impetus to procreate.

They believe that if kids are given true and correct information, they will become sexualized. Without that external sexualization, there will never be desire nor understanding of what to do.

Now understand the hypocrisy involved. While thinking that if you sequester a young child from any and all awareness that sex exists, they go for the sex ed classes. But their kids watch all the highly sexualized television, movies, and video games that every other kid does.

The side purpose is of course, as the article says, to provide other people’s kids with more ways to fail, failure being pregnancy and STDs. They don’t really believe that their own kids will procreate in middle school, because they can ignore the stats that show right wing religious kids have more sex and more pregnancy. Just like mom and dad, who were more likely to have that shotgun wedding.

The politics of porn

angela — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:24:44 +0000

A cute video that gets right to the point. Porn fights back in the war on porn!

Will the real Mitt Romney please stand up?

angela — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:38:49 +0000

This takeoff on Slim Shady is pure genius.

We’ll Occupy – repost this song

angela — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:56:58 +0000

This is such an inspiring song.

Thank you very much, Republicans

angela — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:18:20 +0000

Did I say “thank you”? I meant “Fuck You”.

SOPA/PIPA pie

angela — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:31:03 +0000

The Real Mitt Romney

angela — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:08:29 +0000

When Mitt Romney was leaving the office of the Governor of Massachusetts, he trashed all official correspondence. But he can’t hide his history. Here are ads created by Ted Kennedy’s campaign when Mitt Romney ran against him.

Newt Gingrich: Congressional Budget Office Is ‘A Reactionary Socialist Institution’

angela — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:59:00 +0000

Gingrich says “health care mandates at the state or local level would lead to socialized medicine”. What is a health care mandate? Is that where we would be required to get treatment by our city or town? And even if that were being discussed, which it is not, it would lead to Medicare for all? How?

If Newt doesn’t like the fact that the CBO won’t accept as fact GOP funny numbers and fake facts, perhaps he should work on his truthfulness.

Newt has completely lost touch with reality.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Peter King: Occupy Wall Street Protesters Are ‘Losers’

angela — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:17:04 +0000

Average Americans will not complain when they “have to go to the Salvation Army to get a TV or to shop for cloths(?)”. If it reaches the point where Americans cannot afford new televisions or even used ones on the open market, it will become like the situation with cars, where lots of average Americans can no longer afford to replace their cars at all because prices for used cars tripled, thanks to unintended effects of government actions. So lots of Americans cannot work because they no longer have access to transportation. Pretty “simple minded” of you to expect people to give up their cell phones, again, making it impossible to work or find a job.

Lots of Americans have given up television rather than paying extortionate rates for TVs and cable. Perhaps you should try watching less Fox News, which certainly wouldn’t want you to realize that is an option.
More on Occupy Wall Street
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Rick Perry Challenges Nancy Pelosi To A Debate

angela — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:33:51 +0000

Rick Perry has been immersing himself in right wing propaganda so long he is unaware that Pelosi is actually a ruthless politician, rather than a silly woman to marginalize. She would chew him up and spit him out.
More on Rick Perry 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost